Labor Unions and Catholic Social Teaching

My father broke his back when he was 30 years old; he had four children under the age of 9. When it became impossible for him to go to work, my parents sold the new station wagon they had recently bought (a red ’59 Chevy Bel Air—if you are old enough you may recall its fine horizontal fins) and put the money back in the bank, expecting to need it for food, mortgage and utilities.

LinemanAt that point my father had been working for ATT (back when it owned all of the regional telephone companies) for only six years, but he belonged to a labor union. The contract negotiated with ATT by the Communications Workers of America provided him with the surgery and other medical care he needed as well as a salary during the months he could not work. The back surgery was a success, and after a few months the body cast came off and he continued to work for the telephone company for another twenty-eight years. The contracts that allowed him to keep his job while recovering was a good thing for both the employees and the corporation: the extensive education in electronics that my father received from ATT, for example, continued to benefit the company for almost three decades.

That was 1960, when labor unions were more common and more socially acceptable. Today, because of the war on unions and the poor in general, things are different. In a recent Labor Day editorial, Howard Hubbard, retired bishop of Albany, noted that “union membership is down, representing 11 percent of the overall workforce and 7 percent of private sector workers in 2013. In 1983, unions represented 20 percent of the overall workforce.” In Washington, “for-profit corporations outnumber those representing labor unions 50 to 1. About 72 percent of all expenditures on lobbying originate with organizations representing businesses.” Bishop Hubbard insists that “[i]t is imperative, therefore, that we promote workers’ organizations that defend their rights and ward off those forces of capitalism that can be exploitive and dehumanizing.”

Fortunately, there are glimmers of hope. Here in North Carolina an interfaith “Labor Sabbath” was organized in an effort to encourage ministers to mention the importance of unions and worker rights from the pulpit. Of course, Catholic Social Teaching supports the dignity of labor and the workers’ right to unionize, but occasionally it needs to be reawakened from its complacency. In the United States, the legacy of the great labor priests such as John Ryan, Paul Hanley Furfey and George Higgins lives on in Bishop Hubbard and many others. But as John Dilulio Jr. has recently written in America, “without a rebirth of the American Labor movement our nation’s interwoven economic and political inequalities will only become more sizable—and more sinful.”

David Hammond teaches theology for Saint Joseph’s College Online.

Does Reunion Include Dissolution?

Vatican IIThe Second Vatican Council met in the autumn months between 1962 and 1965. Therefore, some fiftieth anniversaries have already come and gone: the Council’s opening, the death of Pope St. John XXIII, and the election of Paul VI. Saint Joseph’s College has contributed its own recognition. This year and next, though, will mark the real fiftieth anniversaries—the passing of conciliar documents like Lumen Gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church, and Gaudium et Spes, the Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World. When you hear or read somebody comment “Vatican II revolutionized the Church,” these documents provide the sparks for that change. We do not suffer a shortage of accounts detailing the changes of Vatican II and their impact throughout the Church. As many of us know, conciliar enthusiasm has not swept everybody off their feet. Perhaps that is why these fiftieth anniversaries of the Council are so important. We are still, as Peter Huff has said, “on the sacred mountain,” seeking to make sense of the Council and its legacy.

Another conciliar document witnessing its golden anniversary this November is Unitatis Redintegratio, the Council’s decree on ecumenism. St. John’s Gospel includes Christ’s prayer to the Father that all His followers may be one, just as He and the Father are one (17:21). So, after the Church’s self-assessment (Lumen Gentium) but before turning its attention to the modern world, the Council duly considered the readily evident fact that Christianity stood torn asunder, represented by many churches instead of one, true, unified Church. Addressing and correcting this sad reality figured among Pope St. John XXIII’s inspiration for the Council. While he did not live to see its promulgation, Unitatis Redintegratio aptly addressed Pope John’s hope.   Non-Catholic Christians were recognized as possessing some, but not all, elements of the Gospel (#3). Furthermore, the Catholic faithful—lay and clergy—are called to “recognize the signs of the times and to take an active and intelligent part” in ecumenical work (#4). Honestly studying the beliefs of other Christians is no longer the purview of a specialized academic few, but now expected of everybody (#9).

Each conciliar document poses so many questions and new avenues of discovery, and Unitatis Redintegratio does not disappoint. A simple one might be: Do we thus give up everything for the Council’s vision? Out with the old, in with the new? Within twenty years of the Council’s conclusion some Catholic theologians called for a complete reorganization of the Church’s perception of itself and other churches and religious traditions. From now on, the argument went, being truly Christian meant de-emphasizing uniquely Christian elements and eschewing many proudly Catholic expressions. So it seemed that Roman Catholic Christian renewal involved dissolving oneself, or at least one’s ecclesiology and theology.

True to form, though, Unitatis Redintegratio contains answers to the very questions it has prompted. The Council fathers made very clear that while common prayer might foster unity, common worship services could often give the wrong impression. Catholics should remain Catholic, while Baptists, Presbyterians, and Pentecostals attended their own affairs (#8). Common concerns such as feeding the poor and serving those afflicted by disaster, though, demonstrated to the world that unity for which Christ had prayed (#12). Finally, almost twenty years ago Pope St. John Paul II addressed the Council’s call to ecumenical dialogue. The papacy, so long a visible obstacle to Protestants, still could serve the pursuit of unity. Some critics seemed dismayed that Catholic intransigence had, once again, reared its ugly head. But John Paul’s reaffirmation of the Council should not have surprised many. Unitatis itself had declared: “Every renewal of the Church essentially consists in an increase of fidelity to her own calling” (#6). That call included the realization that God alone can bring about true Christian unity (#24). Therefore, the road to reunion runs right through the heart of the Church itself.

Guest blogger Jeffrey Marlett blogs at Spiritual Diabetes.